New Zealand Law Society

Navigation menu

Change to process for sentence indications for protocol offences

05 October 2017

The Chief Judges of the High and District Courts have announced changes to the arrangement for sentence indications in relation to court of trial protocol cases.

The changes are effective immediately.

The Criminal Procedure Act 2011 is silent on the timing of sentence indications in relation to court of trial protocol cases.  In May 2014 the Chief Judges announced that sentence indications should be given in the court in which the case was to be heard.  In practical terms this meant that indications had to occur after the case review hearing.

After consultation with the Executive Judges of both courts about the operation of that arrangement the Chief Judges now say they have concluded that the arrangement should change as it can have the unintended effect of lengthening time to disposal for some cases.

The new practice

From now the practice will be that the District Court will retain the case file and provide a sentence indication where:

  • A sentence indication is sought for a protocol offence or for any group of charges that includes a protocol offence; and
  • No order has been made under section 68 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The Chief Judges say there will be two exceptions to this practice:

Where timeliness is an issue: A District Court judge may direct the file and request for a sentence indication be referred to the High Court accompanied by the usual protocol recommendation as well as a note identifying the delay until the next available date for a sentence indication in the District Court; or

Where the nature of the alleged offending and defendant’s history is such that Preventive Detention might be imposed or where the District Court judge might otherwise decline jurisdiction: A District Court judge will refer the application for an indication to the High Court so the sentence indication is given by the most appropriate court.

Last updated on the 16th September 2019