The Articulate Advocate: Persuasive Skills for Lawyers in Trials, Appeals, Arbitrations and Motions, 2nd edition
By Brian K Johnson and Marsha Hunter
Reviewed by Garry Williams
In 1992, Tom Amberry, a 72-year-old retiree, walked onto a basketball court in Riverside, California and made 2,750 consecutive free throws without a miss. This, at the time, was a world record. In fact, Dr Amberry could have made more, but he was asked to leave so that they could close the gym.
LeBron James’ NBA career free throw percentage is currently 73.9%, which means he misses roughly one out of every four free throws he takes. LeBron is one of the highest-paid professional basketball players in the world – he has just signed a four-year deal with the LA Lakers worth around US$135 million – yet compared to the late Dr Amberry he sucks at taking free throws.
Now Dr Amberry freely admitted that he was no athlete. So why then was he so much better than “King James” at taking free throws?
The answer is simple. He had cultivated a great technique.
And that is really what The Articulate Advocate is all about. Its stated goal is to give its readers the tools to develop, explore and expand their own “distinctly individual style adaptable to any advocacy challenge”. In other words, it aims to provide strategies to cultivate effective courtroom communication techniques.
At the time of writing, the paperback edition of The Articulate Advocate was available from Amazon for US$16.99, while the Kindle edition only costs US$9.99.
It is a short book, around 230 pages long. This means it can be read quickly but its content is such that there is significant value in revisiting the material time and time again.
There are five chapters in Johnson and Hunter’s work.
Chapter 1 is called Your Body and provides advice in relation to how an advocate should stand, move, breathe, gesture and use the adrenaline inevitably triggered by having to “perform” in court.
Chapter 2 is entitled Your Brain and focuses on strategies for taking control of your thought processes and directing those of the court.
Along with the obvious advice not to speak too quickly, the authors recommend pausing briefly between phrases and sentences and listening to the silence to integrate it into your presentation. This is said to allow the court time to think about what has just been said and to be influenced by it. In other words, it is argued that “persuasion happens in the silence” and therefore it should be used to give judges, juries or arbitrators time to process your words.
The importance of echo memory (the phenomenon of a listener’s brain echoing back what has just been said to the listener) and primacy and regency (listeners pay close attention to the beginnings and endings of presentations) as persuasive techniques are also stressed. The authors therefore recommend utilising these moments by saying something that you really want the listener to remember.
Chapter 3 relates to Your Voice.
The take out from this chapter is that in order to use your voice persuasively you need to take the time necessary to make choices about which words to place emphasis on. Again, silence is said to be the secret ingredient of persuasive speech. Accordingly, it is recommended to “speak in phrases, rather than whole sentences”. But, variation of pace is also required if you are to avoid monotony.
This chapter also contains excellent advice on how to avoid saying “um” or “ah”. These “thinking noises” occur when you know it’s your turn to speak but you need a moment to think of what to say. The proffered solution is to use the phrase “mind the gap” as a reminder to insert a gap of silence between phrases. As the authors say:
“It is much easier to break a habit when you can give your brain a positive instruction, such as “mind the gap”, rather than a negative one: ‘Don’t say um!’. The negative instruction doesn’t work because it keeps you focused on the problem not the solution.”
Chapter 4 is all about How to Practise. This chapter provides guidance on how to practise advocacy skills with a view to improvement. It also contains specific exercises to solve particular problems, such as: speaking too softly, the inability to stand still, speaking too quickly, saying “okay” after the witness answers, beginning questions on cross-examination with “and”; and being boring.
Given that opportunities for advocacy are not as plentiful as they once were, the guidance on how to practise the techniques outlined in the work will be particularly useful for new practitioners.
Chapter 5 is entitled Applying Your Skills at Trial. This chapter places the skills and techniques discussed in the earlier chapters in the context of particular aspects of the adversarial process. It attempts to “integrate the delivery skills” previously discussed with the unique requirements of each phase of a trial.
In essence, The Articulate Advocate is a great place for an aspiring advocate to start if they want to master the presentation skills required for court work.
A good indication of the value of the work is that it now forms the basis of a two-day programme called The Articulate Advocate run in the United States by Ms Hunter for the National Institute for Trial Advocacy.
In my view, younger advocates will gain much from studying it, while more experienced barristers will find sufficient in its pages to improve or polish the skills they already possess.
If only LeBron would take the same approach to free throws.
Crown King Books, 978-1-939506-0-30, March 2016, paperback, 248 pages.
Garry Williams firstname.lastname@example.org is a barrister in Auckland’s Richmond Chambers and a member of the NZBA Training Committee.
Last updated on the 5th October 2018