New Zealand Law Society - ACC endorses fairness of its review process

ACC endorses fairness of its review process

This article is over 3 years old. More recent information on this subject may exist.

ACC says its clients can have complete confidence that it is administering its dispute resolution process legally and appropriately.

Part 5 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 requires ACC to engage reviewers, and to arrange the allocation of reviews. It does this through a contract with FairWay Resolution Ltd.

"FairWay has proper, and duly documented, legal authority to deliver review services and decisions," a statement from ACC says.

"Under the contract, when we receive a review application from a claimant we send a letter to FairWay instructing them to allocate a reviewer. By engaging FairWay to appoint reviewers, and allocate reviews, we are strengthening the arms-length and independent nature of those reviewers, which is consistent with our duties under the Act to ensure the independence of the dispute resolution process," ACC says.

"That contract – signed by our Chief Executive, acting on a specific delegation from the Board – supports ACC to deliver review services in an effective and efficient manner. The contract documents FairWay’s roles and authority in relation to these services, and meets the delegation requirements of the Act and the Crown Entities Act 2004.

"Ministerial prior approval of a delegation of review services is not required because under the Act, dispute resolution is a “service” provided to claimants, and the Act expressly authorises delegation of services without prior Ministerial approval under section 73(1)(d) of the Crown Entities Act."

ACC says it acknowledges that its contractual relationship with FairWay "may create a perception that reviewers are not independent of ACC".

It says this is a perception, not the reality "and we note that Miriam Dean QC conducted a thorough review of the statutory review process in 2016 and was satisfied that, despite this perception, reviewers do in fact act independently of ACC."

ACC says it monitors the quality of the services provided by FairWay "by giving them feedback on a limited number of review decisions that we consider do not meet the standards claimants are entitled to expect."

"We do this via our Review Monitoring Panel, which meets once a week to make decisions on whether to file, defend, or settle appeals, and to review decisions. The Panel provides monthly feedback to FairWay about adverse decisions where we feel it is warranted. That feedback largely focuses on the weighting given to clinical evidence or legal application of the Accident Compensation Act."