Skip to main content
New Zealand Law Society - Legal Complaints Review Officer
Branches, sections and groups
About us
Contact us
Careers
Membership
Law Society Connect
Go to registry
Logout
Search button
Close search
Open menu
Close menu
Branches, sections and groups
About us
Go to registry
Logout
For the public
Back
For the public
Find a lawyer
Choosing and working with a lawyer
Legal fees and billing
Lawyers Complaints Service
Lawyers' Fidelity Fund
Common legal issues
Professional practice
Back
Professional practice
Law reform and advocacy
Rules and maintaining professional standards
Continuing Professional Development
Diversity and inclusion
Legal practice
Working overseas
Client care and complaints
Practising Well
Practice briefings
Law library
Will notices
Legal jobs
Get involved
Courts Roundup
Starting as a lawyer
Lawyers Complaints Service
Back
Lawyers Complaints Service
Before making a complaint
How the complaints process works
How to make a complaint
Possible complaint outcomes
What we do and don't do
Decisions
Strike offs and do not employ orders
News
Back
News
Publications
Newsroom
Law Society statements
Events
Back
Events
Gender Equality and the Future of the Profession
Page location
Home
Lawyers Complaints Service
Decisions
Legal Complaints Review Officer
Legal Complaints Review Officer
Unsatisfactory conduct findings reversed
Instructing solicitor failed to pay barrister
Lawyer should have checked property ownership
LCRO upholds no further action decision
Barrister missed service deadline
Failed to provide client care information
Firm did not maintain due separation between offices
Oversight didn't warrant disciplinary action
Lawyer failed to reply to liquidator
Lawyer was acting as trustee
Loading...
Next
Show more
